Nano-Aggressions

Shortly after the discovery of Mirco-Aggressions in the early 1990’s a group of Far-Left Social Justice theoreticians predicted the existence of elusive Nano-Aggressions, which they defined as 1/1000 of a Micro-Aggression. Because of their anticipated extremely small extension in multi-dimensional Aggression-Space, Nano-Aggressions, if they did exist, would be expected to behave according to the strange laws of Quantum Mechanics.

This implies that the putative Nano-Aggressions:

  • Could tunnel through walls
  • Could be in multiples places at the same time
  • Would be indeterminate until measured
  • Could be non-local and entangled with other Nano-Aggressions anywhere in the Universe

 

In addition, it is speculated that Nano-Aggressions were force carrying particles with spin zero. This would mean that they would be bosons and would not obey the Pauli exclusion principle, in which case any number of Nano-Aggressions could occupy the same quantum state and could result in cumulative Nano-Aggression beams of high amplitude.

 

Conclusive proof of the existence of Nano-Aggressions was lacking in 1990’s. The only “evidence” at the time for their existence were reports of occasional detection by a very small numbers of the most sensitive Social Justice Warriors. These reports were, however, never confirmed under controlled laboratory conditions and critics attributed the reports to detector error.

 

Because of the extreme sociological and legal importance of the supposed Nano-Aggressions, research on their existence has been well funded by the federal government and by special interest NGOs for decades. This has recently resulted in the successful experimental detection of Nano-Aggressions by two independent groups. 

 

A Japanese group at the University of Tokyo has recently reported positive results from the most sensitive test for Nano-Aggressions yet performed. The experiment was performed in an abandoned, mile-deep, underground salt mine shielded with two-feet of solid lead walls to block surface Micro-Aggressions, which would otherwise overload their sensors. The detection chamber was filled with the most sensitive sensors available … very far-left Social Justice Warriors. As soon as a critical mass of detectors were in place the observation of Nano-Aggressions was immediate! So many of these, previously only hypothesized, Nano-Aggression particles were detected that the experiment had to be aborted moments after it began for fear of a massive sensor meltdown. The sensors were hurriedly provided with Nano-Aggression canceling headphones that soothed the detectors by playing the song “Feelings” by Barry Manilow.

 

A second study, carried out by the prestigious New York Times, reported the detection of a Nano-Aggression by quoting, out of context, an anonymous source who thinks they might have heard a Nano-Aggression while they were on the subway. The New York Times editorial board wrote that, “Substantiation by a second anonymous source will prove beyond any doubt the existence of Nano-Aggressions”.

 

With this proof of the existence of Nano-Aggressions, the search for Pico-Aggressions has begun. A Pico-Aggression is 1/1000 of a Nano-Aggression and their detection will require the development of completely new technology since Pico-Aggressions are theorized to exist only at temperatures close to absolute zero. Funding has already been approved by the United Nations for both the Japanese and the New York Times research efforts. The funds were obtained by diverting financial resources from the Children’s Cholera Prevention program.

 

Upon hearing the news of the proof of the existence of Nano-Aggressions, leading theorists in Quantum Aggression Research went so far as to predict the existence of Plank-Scale-Aggressions. These aggressions are predicted to be the smallest aggressions possible within the constraints of the known laws of physics. Current theory predicts that Plank-Scale-Aggressions can only exist at the very center of Massively Delusional Black Holes.

 

Full Disclosure: The author of this article received funding from The Institute for the Preservation of Sanity and Common Sense.